22-05-2008, 08:50 PM | #21 | |
Member
Incubating
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
|
|
23-05-2008, 07:58 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 6,479
|
I'm glad I'm not the only one that feels that way as most people are only to ready to call them pests, shoot them or cut down their trees along with hunting the fox.
|
23-05-2008, 08:05 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,702
|
Who has mentioned fox hunting? The Grey squirrel is an invader in this country, and I'd quite happily support there eradication from this country to see the return of the red Squirrel. On the other hand I don't think the current fox hunting ban goes nearly far enough, as people are still exploiting loop holes.
Getting rid of Grey squirrels in this country has nothing to do with sport, its about returning balance to our countryside, and allowing our own native squirrel to return. If there was plans to eradicate Grey squirrels in the USA, I'd be opposed to that, as that is where they belong. |
23-05-2008, 08:24 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 6,479
|
Do you really think that by getting rid of all the greys the reds would reappear, if that was the case then most of us would gladly go along with it, the reds wouldn't and couldn't live where we are as the trees etc are the wrong sort , if you put the reds here they would die, as far as I know they require fir/pine tree forests we have none of those near us, they might come back in areas where they could survive and I'd have no problem with erradicating the grey in those parts if it gave the reds more of a chance, but talking about a total erradication of a species that we introduced to me is a terrible thing to say I'm sure they aren't the only non native animal in this country, control yes in the reds areas but not mass murder.
|
23-05-2008, 08:37 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,702
|
What do you mean the trees are the wrong sort? The native habitat of the Red squirrel is the deciduous forests of England, in fact the very area you live in, they have been displaced to the pine forests in Scotland as they can't compete with the Grey squirrel.
You should find out more about the Red squirrel, the only reason they now mainly live in pine Forrest's is because they have an advantage over the Grey squirrel there, they thrived in areas that the Grey squirrel now inhabit for thousands of years before man interfered. So yes total eradication of the Grey squirrel from the UK, would allow the red to recolonize the entire UK, just as they once did. And no they aren't the only introduced species, other species as well are causing problems for our native wildlife, signal crayfish,( another US invader, sorry Danny), is causing problems for our fish stocks and out competing our native crayfish. |
23-05-2008, 08:41 AM | #26 |
Member
Incubating
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 129
|
Quite so, the current state of the poor old Reds has more to do with habitat change and persecution than competition from Greys. Licences to shoot reds were only withdrawn in the 70's and in some areas they coexisted for twenty years.
I agree that a 'fire break' is needed to preserve existing red populations but killing greys in most of the country is like killing domestic dogs to help bring back the wolf |
23-05-2008, 08:48 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,702
|
You could quite happily reintroduce wolves into this country, domestic dogs would not out compete them, the wolves would make a tasty snack out of most domestic dogs, so that parallel does not work.
As for them coexisting, the reds have been pushed back for the last hundred years since Grey's were introduced, until we reached the situation today were reds cling to a few remote areas, work is still under way to see if these areas of population are stable, or to see if Grey's are still encroaching onto ever dwindling red populations. The main reason for red decline in Grey squirrel encroachment, not habitat change or persecution. That is why is certain areas of there natural range, where Grey's were never introduced, and can't get there through natural spread, reds still thrive. |
23-05-2008, 08:59 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 6,479
|
sorry if I got it wrong about their habitat but most of the sites I've looked on say that the reds DO prefer coniferous forests so I assumed that they knew what they were talking about, anyway as its not likely that a mass cull of the greys is going to happen apart from where the reds already are then mine are still welcome in my garden, and as I can't go out and buy some reds to reintroduce into our park going out and killing all the ones in the park wouldn't do any good, so untill the law or whatever changes then I shall carry on rearing and letting them go as my few per year won't make the slightest bit of difference to the population.
|
23-05-2008, 09:02 AM | #29 | |
Member
Incubating
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
The fact remains that the more arboreal nature of the reds makes them less suited to the vast areas of the country which are now urban and settled. Some lucky devils still get reds in their gardens but a broken canopy and housing estates favours the more terrestrial and opportunistic grey. |
|
23-05-2008, 10:43 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Adult
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,702
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|